Dr. Peter Doshi, Associate Editor of The British Medical Journal, and Associate Professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, speaking on the Nov. 2, 2021 expert panel on US Federal Vaccine Mandates convened by Sen. R. Johnson. Dr.Doshi expresses his concern on how "The world has bet the farm on vaccines as the solution to the pandemic, but the trials are not focused on answering the questions many might assume they are."
During the discussion, Dr. doshi explains how since data is fundamental to scientific proccess, surely it must be available, yet It's not available for covid vaccines. If you want to analyze the data from Pfizers vaccine trial, you will have to wait until 2025 before you can even request it from the company. Moderna vaccine data may be available in end of 2022. The trial for the vaccines still have not ended and clinical trial data won't be available for the next couple of years. While we're told to follow the science, what we are following is not a process based on data.
We're following a process in which the data is kep secret. The point Dr. Doshi trying to make is that the "data for vaccines is not available and won't be for years, yet the COVID vaccine is being mandated accross the world. Without data it is not science."
Doshi said we are not in a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” as the media claims. If hospitalizations and deaths occur almost exclusively in unvaccinated people, “why would booster shots be necessary?” asked Doshi. “And why would the statistics be so different in the United Kingdom, where most hospitalizations and deaths from COVID occur among the fully vaccinated?”
“There’s a correlation there that you should be curious about,” Doshi said. “Something’s not right.”
During the discussion Doshi touched on the definition of "anti-vaccination" and scrutinized the definition of that term. He presented to the panel the definition straight out of Websters Dictionary as "a person who opposes the use of vaccines or regulations mandating vaccination.”
“The second part [of the definition] surprised me,” Doshi said.
Another point worth considering is how Websters Dictionary changed their definition
of a vaccine earlier this year. Doshi spoke on this during th panel and said the following:
Another point worth considering is how Websters Dictionary changed their definition of a vaccine earlier this year. Doshi spoke on this during th panel and said the following:
“I contend that these products, which everyone calls mRNA vaccines, are qualitatively different from standard vaccines,”. “So I found it fascinating to learn that Merriam Webster changed the definition of vaccine earlier this year.... The mRNA products did not meet the definition of a vaccine that has been in place for more than 15 years, but the definition was expanded, so that mRNA products are now vaccines,”.